Even though they bring stronger academic records than any other racial group, Asian-Americans who apply to Harvard University face the lowest acceptance rates, according to a study of admissions records filed on Friday by a group that is suing the school over alleged discrimination.
Students for Fair Admissions said Harvard routinely assigns lower scores to Asian-American students in subjective ratings meant to measure attributes such as likability, courage and kindness, putting them at a major disadvantage compared with white students.
Edward Blum, a legal strategist who founded the organization, said in a statement that his group’s filing “exposes the startling magnitude of Harvard’s discrimination.”
Harvard blasted the study in an opposing court filing and submitted a countering study that found no evidence of bias.
In a statement, the school called the lawsuit an attack on its ability to consider race in admissions, which it has said is necessary to gather a racially diverse mix of students.
“Harvard will continue to vigorously defend our right, and that of other colleges and universities nationwide, to seek the educational benefits that come from a class that is diverse on multiple dimensions,” the university said.
The studies were filed in the US District Court for the District of Massachusetts as both sides attempted to persuade a judge to end the suit before it reaches trial, which has been scheduled to start in October.
It marked a step forward in a lawsuit that has lasted nearly four years and has drawn the attention of the US Department of Education, which is also looking into Harvard’s use of race in admissions.
Both sides built their cases on six years of admissions decisions at Harvard. The records, for students who applied from 2010 to 2015, are barred from the public, but the dueling analyses offered a rare glimpse into the secretive inner workings of the school’s admission office.
According to the filings, each applicant is assigned a numerical value in four categories — academic, extracurricular, athletic and personal — along with an overall score that is meant to be comprehensive, but is not based on any particular formula.
Ultimately the decision comes down to a committee of 40 people who review each applicant.
For students who choose to submit their race, Harvard has said it is considered as one factor among many that might “inform an applicant’s life experience” and the contributions they will offer.
However, the study shared by the group, which was conducted by Duke University economist Peter Arcidiacono, found that race plays a major role and works against Asian-Americans.
The study found that if Harvard relied only on the academic scores it assigns to each applicant, more than half of admitted students would have been Asian-American over the six-year period.
Instead, they made up 22 percent.
The university said the analysis is flawed, because it excludes applicants believed to have an advantage regardless of race, including relatives of alumni and athletes recruited by the school.
Instead, Harvard sought its own study from David Card, an economist at the University of California, Berkeley, who found no evidence of discrimination.
Looking at a wider pool of applicants and admissions factors, Card found that the effect of being Asian-American was “statistically indistinguishable from zero.”
Harvard also objected to the group’s use of a 2013 internal study that was uncovered during discovery.
The inquiry, which was conducted amid earlier allegations of bias, explored the racial makeup of the school’s admitted class.
A chart from the report indicated that, even considering factors like legacy status and extracurricular activities, Asian-Americans would be expected to make up about 26 percent of the admitted class.
In reality, they made up 19 percent.
The group said the report is proof of intentional discrimination and that Harvard “killed the study and quietly buried the reports.”
Harvard countered that the study was never intended to evaluate possible discrimination and that it was “incomplete, preliminary and based on limited inputs.”
SEEKING CHANGE: A hospital worker said she did not vote in previous elections, but ‘now I can see that maybe my vote can change the system and the country’ Voting closed yesterday across the Solomon Islands in the south Pacific nation’s first general election since the government switched diplomatic allegiance from Taiwan to Beijing and struck a secret security pact that has raised fears of the Chinese navy gaining a foothold in the region. The Solomon Islands’ closer relationship with China and a troubled domestic economy weighed on voters’ minds as they cast their ballots. As many as 420,000 registered voters had their say across 50 national seats. For the first time, the national vote also coincided with elections for eight of the 10 local governments. Esther Maeluma cast her vote in the
Nearly half of China’s major cities are suffering “moderate to severe” levels of subsidence, putting millions of people at risk of flooding, especially as sea levels rise, according to a study of nationwide satellite data released yesterday. The authors of the paper, published by the journal Science, found that 45 percent of China’s urban land was sinking faster than 3mm per year, with 16 percent at more than 10mm per year, driven not only by declining water tables, but also the sheer weight of the built environment. With China’s urban population already in excess of 900 million people, “even a small portion
UNSETTLING IMAGES: The scene took place in front of TV crews covering the Trump trial, with a CNN anchor calling it an ‘emotional and unbelievably disturbing moment’ A man who doused himself in an accelerant and set himself on fire outside the courthouse where former US president Donald Trump is on trial has died, police said yesterday. The New York City Police Department (NYPD) said the man was declared dead by staff at an area hospital. The man was in Collect Pond Park at about 1:30pm on Friday when he took out pamphlets espousing conspiracy theories, tossed them around, then doused himself in an accelerant and set himself on fire, officials and witnesses said. A large number of police officers were nearby when it happened. Some officers and bystanders rushed
HYPOCRISY? The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs yesterday asked whether Biden was talking about China or the US when he used the word ‘xenophobic’ US President Joe Biden on Wednesday called for a hike in steel tariffs on China, accusing Beijing of cheating as he spoke at a campaign event in Pennsylvania. Biden accused China of xenophobia, too, in a speech to union members in Pittsburgh. “They’re not competing, they’re cheating. They’re cheating and we’ve seen the damage here in America,” Biden said. Chinese steel companies “don’t need to worry about making a profit because the Chinese government is subsidizing them so heavily,” he said. Biden said he had called for the US Trade Representative to triple the tariff rates for Chinese steel and aluminum if Beijing was